Diplomat Correspondent
Kargil, March 14(DD) Political activist and prominent Ladakhi voice Sajad Kargili has raised serious concerns over the growing sense of alienation and discontent in Ladakh since its separation from Jammu and Kashmir on August 5, 2019. Speaking on the issue, Kargili said that Ladakhis feel “betrayed” as the region struggles with unemployment, lack of governance structure, and a complete absence of political representation.
“In Jammu and Kashmir, at least people have their own representatives. But Ladakh has been left without a legislative assembly, and our voices are not being heard,” Kargili stated, emphasizing that the region is facing an identity and governance crisis.
Kargili pointed out that joblessness among Ladakhi youth is at an all-time high, with no major industries or private sector investments to create employment opportunities. The government has failed to introduce a structured employment policy, leaving thousands of educated youth in uncertainty.
The Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Councils (LAHDCs) of Leh and Kargil, which were expected to play a crucial role in local governance, are still functioning without formal business rules. This has significantly limited their decision-making powers, making them ineffective in addressing public grievances and local development needs.
Unlike Jammu and Kashmir, which has its own political representatives and the possibility of future statehood restoration, Ladakh remains without a legislature or elected government. The region is directly governed by bureaucrats appointed by the central government, leaving locals without a say in their own affairs.
Since becoming a Union Territory, Ladakh has witnessed rising demands for special constitutional protections under the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. The Sixth Schedule, which provides autonomy and protection for tribal communities in northeastern states, has been a long-standing demand of Ladakhis, particularly in Leh and Kargil, to safeguard their land, jobs, and cultural identity.
However, despite multiple protests, strikes, and negotiations, the demand remains unfulfilled, deepening public frustration. “We have been repeatedly assured of protection, but there has been no concrete action. Ladakhis are not only struggling for their rights but also their future,” Kargili said.
With increasing dissatisfaction, political and social groups across Ladakh are urging the central government to take immediate action. Many fear that prolonged neglect could lead to stronger protests and a further divide between Ladakh and the government(DD)
